star treker wrote:Yes, there were times when eye candy meant loss of RAM, and that was people's reasons against it. But most people have between 8 to 32 gigs now days, so RAM can no longer be used as an excuse for simplistic looking OS's lol. Great job buddy!
This is a really good point!
Honestly, on my machine I notice maybe a .1% (Yes POINT one) difference between using a simple and flat basic theme and an intense resource hog theme. And my machine aint that great. It was top of the line ten years ago, though.
star treker wrote:Some people don't like the simplistic look of some OS's, we want eye candy, and lots of it.
I remember reading a quote by someone. I cannot find it now, but this jist is that he calls anyone who likes themes "nubes." Obviously, he must speak to you in a derogatory way if you do not agree with HIS personal preferences, right?
He says something like, "My computer is my workbench. If I sometimes must spend as much as 12 hours a day on it, I want it to look simple and basic."
How far off can you be?
If I had to spend 12 hours a day at a computer, I would want it to look AMAZING. Something would have to make that enjoyable. It would need to do all sorts of things to keep me sane spending that much time on it.
What a "nube" that guy must be.