lekkerzorin wrote:I tried to find alternatives to Google with no success. I like the way the gmail, Google drive, Google docs and so on are integrated.
Use Firefox most of the time, but Google services works great inside it.
I disagree about Google Drive, though. No matter what O.S. I have used, including the app on Android, Google drive over the course of many years was always Glitch Central. It would upload the wrong files and download the wrong files. Out of a group, it would screw up at least one file from that group most of the time. It would lose files, too. Sometimes, it showed the file as present but when you access it, it was blank.
I absolutely HATE Google Drive.
I see your point- integration is the key. Google has a Semi-monopoly. Technically another venture could try to compete, but they can never get a leg up to do it properly.
Another example of this would be eBay. While there are many who try to compete, the thing is that Sellers go to eBay because it has The Market already- that is where the buyers look. And buyers go to eBay because that is where the sellers are. So if you start up an alternative site, there are so few bidders and so few buyers and so few sellers, that you cannot really compete.
To try to compete with incentives, you would not make enough to expand and grow to compete.
Without being able to expand, you cannot build a balanced buyer/seller presence to make it worthwhile for either. Without enough sellers, there are not enough products to interest buyers. Without enough buyers, there is not enough gain to interest sellers in the Major Hassle that selling (like on eBay) is.
These semi-monopolies are not "true monopolies," but just as effective as "true monopolies." The strongest competitor to eBay would be Amazon. But Amazon lacks bidding and is not great for finding Great Vintage Items. Amazon does not like to deal in "used" stuff. So I could argue that each cornered a Share of market, rather than directly competing.
Google gets its gains from selling advertising and information. That is why the promote so much "free" stuff. It's not really- like Radio playing music for "Free," they make their money on advertising. But Google has taken it further, by being a Marketing Company. Marketing is all about Increasing the Profit. The fallacy, of course is that there must be an upper limit to high profits can get- and you can see the slippery slope as to how far a company may be willing to go to inch those profits upward. Google has been busted with invasive spying many times and this is well documented. Yet, people keep using their services, lacking trust in them, because they become complacent with the spoon-fed convenience.
No alternatives to google are likely in the near future, at least- or maybe even in the far one. You have a choice- accept the shafting for the convenience they offer... Or accept whether that convenience is really worth the cost.
Me... I am kinda old school. A bathroom is convenient, but I can poop in the woods if someone installs a peephole on the bathroom door.