wptophat wrote:Hey Aravisian, thanks for the advice. I will look into pCloud.
That said, I am not likely to switch as I have GSuite business account so that I can easily collab with my employees, freelancers, and clients. Between the email, google docs, and drive, there is no other solution I know of that offers these, except maybe Zoho comes close.
At any rate, I will give it a shot with Thunar. Honestly, I do not like Nautilus and don't know why so many distros make it the default. LOL.
Nautilus is well suited to Gnome, so if you choose Gnome for your Distro, Nautilus is the logical FM choice. If you choose XFCE, then Thunar, which is for XFCE will be a better choice. Nemo was for KDE and so on.
The base is the same, even if add on details are different. So you can interchange them. But if you put Nemo on a Gnome system, Nemo won't be as integrated as it would be on a KDE system. Thunar is less integrated on a Gnome system that it would be on an XFCE system.
Does it make a difference to the end-user? I don't know. I suspect that for most like me who are novice, it makes little if any difference. We tend to stumble around and bump into walls no matter what. But the end-user who has been using Linux for over thirty years and sees code in his sleep would undoubtedly notice the difference.
Unlike Microsoft, Linux seems more like Legos to me. With Microsoft, you have far more (Far more!) integration and dependency. The files tend to just get slathered all over the disk without any prep, planning or organization. In an ideal world, a Microsoft system with all programs and packages finely tuned and installed would work perfectly because of its heavy integration. Even though you must defrag it sometimes. Needless to say, it does not work that way (and never will due to human nature.) Linux being more like Lego means that you can customize and build in a larger assortment of configurations, but no matter what, will have small issues to resolve along the way as certain pieces don't fit perfectly together even if they fit "close enough."